THE NATIONWIDE ACADEMY FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION (UK) Ltd.  
   
   
Home   About us   About ADR   NADR Services   Publications
 
   
  Forms   Members   Forums   Links   NMA
 
     
       
   
• Adjudication
• Adjudication Federal Australia
• Adjudication Law Reports
• Adjudication Law Reports 1999
• Adjudication Law Reports 2000
• Adjudication Law Reports 2001
• Adjudication Law Reports 2002
• Adjudication Law Reports 2003
• Adjudication Law Reports 2004
• Adjudication Law Reports 2005
• Adjudication Law Reports 2006
• Adjudication Law Reports 2007
• Adjudication Law Reports 2008
• Adjudication Law Reports Index
• Adjudication New South Wales
• Adjudication New Zealand
• Adjudication Northern Territory
• Adjudication Queensland
• Adjudication Singapore
• Adjudication South Australia
• Adjudication Tasmania
• Adjudication Victoria
• Adjudication Western Australia
• ADR Law Reports
• ADR Law Reports 1997
• ADR Law Reports 1998
• ADR Law Reports 1999
• ADR Law Reports 2000
• ADR Law Reports 2001
• ADR Law Reports 2002
• ADR Law Reports 2003
• ADR Law Reports 2004
• ADR Law Reports 2005
• ADR Law Reports 2006
• ADR Law Reports 2007
• ADR Law Reports 2008
• ADR Law Reports Index
• Alernative Dispute Resolution
• Arbitration
• Arbitration Law Reports 1996
• Arbitration Law Reports 1997
• Arbitration Law Reports 1998
• Arbitration Law Reports 1999
• Arbitration Law Reports 2000
• Arbitration Law Reports 2001
• Arbitration Law Reports 2002
• Arbitration Law Reports 2003
• Arbitration Law Reports 2004
• Arbitration Law Reports 2005
• Arbitration Law Reports 2006
• Arbitration Law Reports 2007
• Arbitration Law Reports 2008
• Arbitration Law Reports Index
• Arbitration Older Reports
• Banking
• Commercial Law Reports 1997
• Commercial Law Reports 1998
• Commercial Law Reports 1999
• Commercial Law Reports 2000
• Commercial Law Reports 2001
• Commercial Law Reports 2002
• Commercial Law Reports 2003
• Commercial Law Reports 2004
• Commercial Law Reports 2005
• Commercial Law Reports 2006
• Commercial Law Reports 2007
• Commercial Law Reports 2008
• Commercial Law Reports Index
• Conflicts of Law
• Constitution Law Reports
• Constitutional Law
• Construction
• Construction Law Reports
• Construction Law Reports 2000
• Construction Law Reports 2001
• Construction Law Reports 2002
• Construction Law Reports 2003
• Construction Law Reports 2004
• Construction Law Reports 2005
• Construction Law Reports 2006
• Construction Law Reports 2007
• Construction Law Reports 2008
• Construction Law Reports Index
• Dispute Review Boards
• Education
• Employment
• Intellectual Property
• Legal Research
• Legal Skills and Practice
• Mediation
• Medical
• Private International Law
• Public International Law
• Public Law
• Shipping & Trade
• Sports Law
• Who's Who

Login
Username

Password



View a printer friendly version of this page.
 
ACT Construction Ltd v E. Clarke & Sons (Coaches) Ltd [2001] ABC.L.R. 01/21
Construction contract – existence of – quantum meruit. This judgment concludes that there was no relevant contract entered into for the work in question, that the claimant\'s entitlement is for a quantum meruit, that that entitlement is enforceable and not tainted by illegality and that an appropriate markup on unpaid invoices should be 15%. Previous payments, based on a higher markup, should remain unaffected. TCC. 21st January 2001.
by HHJ Anthony Thornton : Crown Copyright

Actionstrength Ltd v International Glass Engineering [2001] ABC.L.R. 10/10
Guarantees : A guarantee must be in writing under s4 Statute of Frauds 1677 - so a sub-contractor cannot rely on an oral promise. CA. 10th October 2001.
by Simon Brown LJ, Peter Gibson LJ, Tuckey LJ. Crown Copyright

David Wilson Homes Ltd v Survey Services Ltd [2001] ABC.L.R. 01/18
Arbitration Clause : Interpretation : ". . . any dispute or difference arising hereunder between the Assured and the Insurers shall be referred to a Queen's Counsel of the English Bar to be mutually agreed between the Insurers and the Assured or in the event of disagreement by the Chairman of the Bar Council" held to be an arbitration clause not a non-binding ADR / mediation / conciliation provision. CA. 18th January 2001
by Lord Justice Simon Brown, Lord Justice Longmore :

Farley v. Skinner [2001] ABC.L.R. 10/11
Surveyor’s duty : liability : quantum : Surveyor failed to report on the extent to which property was affected by air traffic. The issue was specifically part of his remit. The owner ultimately decided to retain the property. Economic loss was not therefore an issue. Merely how much should be awarded for loss of amenity and enjoyment of property. 11th October 2001
by Lords Steyn; Browne-Wilkinson; Clyde; Hutton; Scott : Crown Copyright

J. Jarvis & Sons Ltd v Castle Wharf Dev Ltd. [2001] EWCA Civ 19
Quantum Meruit : Tort; Held on appeal – damages for loss and expense overruled. CA. 19th January 2001.
by Peter Gibson LJ ; Arden LJ; Mr Justice Collins. Crown Copyright

Nolan Davis Ltd v Steven P. Catton [2001] ABC.L.R. 03/06
Set aside. Interpretation of compromise agreement setting aside previous enforcement judgement incorporated into Tomlin Order. Application for rectification of terms of Tomlin Order refused. 6th March 2001.
by His Honour Judge David Wilcox. Crown Copyright

Scottish & Newcastle PLC v. G.D. Construction (St Albans) Ltd [2001] ABC.L.R. 03/29
Claimant owner seeks damages against the contractor for fire damage to the existing structure, in respect of the damage caused to the Works by the fire, and in respect of business interruption plus an indemnity under clause 6.1.2 of the Contract in respect of the consequences of the fire. Preliminary declaration of liability. TCC. 29th March 2001.
by His Honour Judge Richard Seymour Q.C. Crown Copyright

Our publications are provided in PDF format, in order to view them you will need Adobe's free Acrobat reader. Acrobat reader can be downloaded from Adobe by following the link to your left.


 
     
       
Top of page
 
       
      THE NATIONWIDE ACADEMY FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION (UK) Ltd.
     

 
    Copyright © NADR 2000, all rights reserved.