THE NATIONWIDE ACADEMY FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION (UK) Ltd.  
   
   
Home   About us   About ADR   NADR Services   Publications
 
   
  Forms   Members   Forums   Links   NMA
 
     
       
   
• ABC OF LAW REPORTS
• ABC OF STATUTES
• ADJUDICATION ACTS
• Adjudication Case Summaries
• ADJUDICATION CASES
• Adjudication New South Wales
• Adjudication NewZealand
• Adjudication Queensland
• Adjudication Reports AU/NZ
• Adjudication Singapore
• Adjudication Victoria
• Adjudication Western Australia
• Adjudicator Nomination Bodies
• ADMIRALTY CASES
• ADR
• ADR in WALES
• ADR NEWS
• ADR Organisations
• Arbitration
• ARBITRATION ACTS
• ARBITRATION CASES
• Arbitration Cases Ireland
• Arbitration Cases Scotland
• Banking and Finance
• Building Claims Consultants
• CONFLICTS ACTS
• CONFLICTS CASES
• Conflicts Lectures
• CONSTITUTION ACTS
• CONSTITUTION CASES
• Constitutional Law
• Construction Bodies
• Construction Law
• CONSTRUCTION LAW CASES
• CONTRACT LAW CASES
• Court Mediation Schemes
• Directories - Yellow Pages
• Dispte Review Boards
• Educational establishments
• Employment Dispute Resolution
• Environment
• Ethics
• European Law and Institutions
• EXPERT WITNESS CASES
• Expert witnesses
• Export Import Directory
• Family Mediation
• Government Bodies
• Health Care Dispute Resolution
• HOME BUILDING CASES
• Intellectual Property
• International Arbitration
• International Trade Law
• Law Societies and Associations
• Legal Publishers
• Legal Research
• Legal Skills
• MARINE INSURANCE CASES
• Maritime Law
• Mediation
• MEDIATION CASES
• Mediation Organisations
• Middle East ADR
• ODR - On Line Dispute Resolution
• On-line ADR Journals and Newsletters
• Practitioners
• PROCEDURE CASES
• SHIPPING - TRANSPORT CASES
• Sources of Law
• Sport
• Telecommunications
• TORT CASES
• Trade Organisations
• Travel

Login
Username

Password



View a printer friendly version of this page.
 

Diploma Construction P/L v Esslemont Nominees P/L [2006] WASAT 350 Construction Contracts Act 2004 (WA) - Whether decision permitting adjudication to proceed reviewable. Raymond.C. State Administrative Tribunal, Western Australia. Commercial & Civil Stream. 30th November 2006.

Marine & Civil Bauer Joint Venture v Leighton Kumagai Joint Venture [2005] WASAT 269 Application for review of decision by adjudicator declining jurisdiction : Whether a constructions contract as defined : Whether if condition precedent to claim not fulfilled the claim is a payment claim as defined. Mr C Raymond (Senior Member) State Administrative Tribunal. Western Australia. 4th October 2005.

Merym P/L v Methodist Ladies College [2008] WASAT 164 Construction Contracts Act 2004 (WA) - Whether previously rejected claims amenable to adjudication by reason of superintendent\'s failure to certify in time - Whether decision to dismiss characterised as a decision made under s 31(2)(a) of Construction Contracts Act 2004. Mr C Raymond. 21st July 2008

Moroney v Murray River North P/L [2008] WASAT 36 Construction contracts - Jurisdiction - Adjudicator has not made a determination if a matter falls within its jurisdiction or if he has made a determination the reasons for his decision are not clear - Inviting adjudicator to clarify the determination and provide reasons for same - Procedures an adjudicator may utilise to obtain sufficient information to make a determination - complexity of a matter. Dr B De Villiers, Member. 19th February 2008

O\'Donnell Griffin P/L v John Holland P/L & Multiplex Contractors P/L t/a Raillink Joint Venture [2008] WASC 58 Building and construction - Payment dispute - Security of payment legislation - Determination by adjudicator under Construction Contracts Act 2004 (WA) - Application for leave to enforce as a judgment of the Supreme Court - Principles governing the exercise of discretion to grant leave. BEECH J: 17th April 2008.

O\\\'Donnell Griffin P/L v Davis [2007] WASC 215 (7 September 2007) Practice and procedure - Application for interlocutory injunction to prevent adjudication under the Construction Contracts Act 2004 (WA) - No cause of action disclosed - Failure to comply with O 59 r 9 - Damages an adequate remedy - Balance of convenience favours defendant - Indemnity costs. Templeman J. 7th September 2007

Silent Vector P/L t/a Sizer Buiders & Squarcini [2008] WASAT 39 Application for review of decision by adjudicator dismissing application without determination on the merits - Whether application could not be fairly determined because of complexity - Whether application not made within prescribed time - Adequacy of reasons for decision. Mr C Raymond, Senior Member. 22nd February 2008


 
     
       
Top of page
 
       
      THE NATIONWIDE ACADEMY FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION (UK) Ltd.
     

 
    Copyright © NADR 2000, all rights reserved.